Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

The True WMSCOG | October 21, 2017

Scroll to top

Top

38 Comments

Ahnsahnghong’s book against Mother God.

Oil Lamp and Ink of Christ Ahnsahnghong

The purpose of Christ Ahnsahnghong in publishing the book, “The New Jerusalem and the Bride: Interpretation on Women’s Veil”

It is true that Christ Ahnsahnghong published this book. However, in order to understand the meaning of the book correctly, we need to understand the situation at that time and the reason why Christ Ahnsahnghong published the book.  Now if we ignore the history behind the publishing of the book and only focus on the text in the book, we will create misinterpretations like the ones on this link.

So why did Christ Ahnsahnghong write the book?

In the early 1980s, a woman named Um Soo In was attending the Church of God. One day, she looked at one Christ Ahnsahnghong’s books that was in His bag without His permission and noticed that Father wrote about Mother appearing as the Bride in the future. She became obsessed by the delusion that she would make herself the Bride. From then on, Um Soo In started to insist that she herself was the Bride, the Heavenly Mother, quoting the book of Christ Ahnsahnghong. Um Soo In even tried to change the teachings Christ Ahnsahnghong gave us and she tempted the Church members by saying that she was entrusted with the mission as the Bride to have women take off their veils.

Due to Um Soo In actions, Christ Ahnsahnghong wrote the book “The New Jerusalem and the Bride: Interpretation on Women’s Veil” and He distributed copies to the Churches. He did this in order to judge Um Soo In and her followers for distorting the truth, and in this way the church members would not be deceived by her false teachings (you can see this in the preface of the book). Christ Ahnsahnghong also went around visiting the churches and delivering sermons on the same context of the book.

Why is this book not available in the Church?

Now do you know what Christ Ahnsahnghong did after the matter of Um Soo In was settled? He collected all the copies of the book, this He did to show that he did not want the members to continue reading this book.  It was a special measures law needed for that time only. However, those who deny Heavenly Mother stubbornly insist on the text book, yet ignore Christ Ahnsahnghong’s will in writing the book. It is no different than insisting Apostle Peter is Satan because Jesus called Him Satan once.

When an enemy approaches a castle, the king often commands for the gate of the fortress to be closed completely, but does the gate remain closed forever? No, once the enemy is defeated the gate is opened once again. Christ Ahnsahnghong did the same thing at that time; He thoroughly closed the door to the truth about Heavenly Mother in 1983 in order to drive away the hindrance from the false Bride. However in the year 1984, He opened the door to the truth about Heavenly Mother again and He testified about Her existence.

 

 

Comments

  1. Crystal

    Christ Ahnsahnghong is really our Heavenly Father, he protected us from being deceived, Had he not made this book we wouldn’t know our true Mother.

  2. Wilmer

    Ignorance always drives people to make erroneous statements. Christ Ahnsahnghong has testified about Heavenly Mother over and over again ever since this incident was rectified. Why would you insist in reading the newspaper of one year ago when you can get the current information by picking up today’s headlines? Listening to the arguments about Um Soo In is doing the same as the aforementioned, truly a foolish thing. I give thanks and praise to Father and Mother because they always save their children from the snare of confusion and in the Church of God there is always an explanation for everything and nothing is ever hidden.

    • Diane

      Wilmer, can you tell me in which books and where exactly he has testified about Heavenly Mother over and over again?

  3. Mindy

    Again, this book actually proves that there is a Heavenly Mother. Can there be a fake Louis Vuitton bag without a real Louis Vuitton bag? No? Then if a false Mother or Bride appears, it is because there must a real one. If not, there would be no relevance in a “Bride” or “Mother” appearing

    • Diane

      Hi Mindy.
      Excellent point. But if you observe carefully, the real Louis Vuitton bag comes first and once it becomes popular then only the fakes start appearing to make a profit out of the original idea. Think about it.
      Think also why nobody knew about mother till Ahnsahnghong died.

  4. Diane

    Let me try to understand.
    You say Ahnsahnghong wrote the book to prove Um Soo In was testifying falsely that she was the heavenly mother.
    But if you read carefully what Ahn has written, he never says that Um Soo In is not mother. He says that the very idea is wrong. He disproves the interpretation of each of the bible verses that Um Soo In used. They are the same verses used now.
    Therefore, an honest reading of Ahn’s book shows that he disproved the existence of heavenly mother altogether not just Um Soo In.
    At a time when he was not wealthy, he spent precious money to publish a book. Why would he do that if it was only temporary? Would it not be better to just preach in the very few churches he had at the time and inform everyone that Um Soo In is a cheat and a fraud and not the real mother?
    Nowhere in the book he gives a hint that there is a heavenly mother. Instead, he proves that the very idea of heavenly mother is delusional. Isn’t this very odd?
    I am trying to understand why he would do that if there really was a heavenly mother.
    I am also trying to understand why there is nothing in his writing to directly claim there is a heavenly mother.
    The book was published in 1980 it appears. When did he collect and destroy the copies? Is there any documentary record of his having done so?

    • The True WMSCOG

      Well, if you read the book carefully you can see that Christ Ahnsahnghong wrote the name of Um Soo In in the preface of the book, letting the reader understand that the book is about Um Soo In. No book written by Christ Ahnsahnghong addresses a single person by name, except in this book.

      Christ Ahnsahnghong explained that the problem with Um Soo In were her “impertinent thoughts.” She proclaimed herself to be the Bride and taught church members that wearing the veil was not important during the time of worship.

      Heavenly Mother Jerusalem is nothing like Um Soo In because she did not proclaim Herself as the Bride. Instead, Christ Ahnsahnghong testified about Her being the bride. There are no similarities between Heavenly Mother and Um Soo In, thus making the argument that Mother is like Um Soo In invalid.

      Please read the articles which address all the questions you have, they can be found here in this website.

      Christ Ahnsahnghong considered that the matter about Um Soo In was worthy enough to print a book about it…this way there is evidence that the testimony about God the Mother is true, otherwise, where would Um Soo In get the idea that there is a Mother God, if not because she looked into Fathers books which had the testimony about Mother?

      God the Mother exists, and just because people do not want to see the evidence it does not mean is not true… Christ Ahnsahnghong wrote about Mother, the evidence is in this link: Who is Heavenly Mother according to Christ Ahnsahnghong?

      • Romeo

        If you read the whole book you can see it’s not only about Um Soo In. It’s not such a long read, you should read it.

        The problem with Um Soo In wasnt only the veil according to Ahnsahnghong. But he mentions that She proclaimed to be the Mother God. Ahnsahnghong not only says that she is not the Mother God but he goes to explain that there’s no Mother God. He actually uses the same verses you use to “prove” that there is a Mother God in order to disprove it, by explaining it in context.

        Which book was it that Um Soo In read to find out about “Mother God”? Which book was that? Personally I think that’s just a WMSCOG excuse about the events. If it was the Green Book, then how did Um Soo In had enough time to read that book and understand the “hidden meaning” without Ahnsahnghong explaining it to her, guess she has awesome angelical understanding or however you guys call it! Also, where is the evidence that Ahnsahnghong asked for the book back? If he did not intend for other people to read it, then he did a pretty bad job at getting them back.

        And Um Soo In could have gotten the idea of Mother God from her imagination … just like Mormons believe in Mother God from their imagination.

        If Ahnsahnghong is really God, then he chose a very ineffective way to prove about “God the Mother”. A book to say there is no God the Mother and an encrypted line in another book to prove there is one.

        • The True WMSCOG

          I have read it, but from the preface you can clearly see is about Um Soo In. Yes Christ Ahnsahnghong said that Um Soo In is not God the Mother, and at that time God the Mother was not revealed yet… for this reason He himself testified to Zahng Gil Jah being God the Mother later on, and He left us evidence like pictures, and audio sermons testifying about God the Mother.

          Um Soo In read from Christ Ahnsahnghong’s notebook, not an actual book. The evidence is in the testimony of those who lived at that time.

          Christ Ahnsahnghong left plenty of evidence for the existence of God the Mother

          • Romeo

            No, you can’t clearly see that from the preface. the preface says “This book was published to stop the troublemaker at church, namely those that misinterpret the Bible and act like a religious fanatic also to explain the errors of the books published by UhmSooIn and testify of the unchanging truth of the Church of our God”, the word ALSO, shows that is not only about UhmSooIn but also about Uhm.

          • The True WMSCOG

            Do You Speak Korean??? How do you know so well that is what the preface says?

            It doesn’t matter how many ways you guys say it, the book as about Um Soo In and about the people who followed her in the Church at that time. Again, the fact that Christ Ahnsahnghong Himself testified about Heavenly Mother Zahng Gil Jah afterwards makes it more clear that the book was only about Um Soo In.

            seriously, you guys sound like a broken record…

          • Diane

            Not sure who sounds like a broken record. You guys keep saying he testified about her but there is absolutely no evidence of that. The words from his writings (some one is to come) and sermons (I follow mother) that you use are so vague that you can interpret them to suit you.
            And then a photograph.
            Not one unambiguous proof.

          • The True WMSCOG

            Even if Christ Ahnsahnghong said : “Zahng Gil Jahnim is God the Mother, believe in Her” … Like that word by word. What difference does it make, if you still do not believe in Christ Ahnsahnghong?

            So to continue arguing with you about this makes no sense. For us who believe we have enough evidence, but to those who do not believe even a statement like the one above would not help.

  5. Diane

    Thank you for your reply. Let me discuss a few points which you have made.
    1. The preface states that the book is published to stop troublemakers who misinterpret the bible and also explain the errors in Umm Soo In’s book. So it appears that the first motive is to stop misinterpretations of the bible.
    2. He said the “impertinent thoughts” are from people LIKE Umm Soo In. So it is not just about Umm Soo In but people like her as well.
    3. As far as I am aware, there is not one word in all of Ahn’s books testifying Zahng as the bride. The only reference which is claimed is in unsealing the 7 thunders. But that neither identifies Zahng, nor does it say Heavenly Mother. On the other hand, Ahn clearly identifies the Bride is the church in the New Jerusalem book.
    4. In the same book, he also identified that Eve is the church and not any specific woman.
    5. The only thing that identifies Zahng is the wedding photograph, but that alone, without a single corroborating sentence from Ahn, carries no weight.
    6. Where is Ahn’s book which has the testimony about the Mother? There is none as far as I know. Could Umm be the one who had the original idea of Mother? Could she have borrowed the idea from the unification church? Could Zahng be the one who borrowed the idea from Umm? Why did it all come up only after Ahn’s death?
    7. Yes Ahn found the matter about Umm worthy enough to publish a book. But rather than proving that the testimony of Mother God is true, his book does exactly the opposite. It does not say there is a Mother God but it is not Umm. It says that the very idea is delusional.
    8. The evidence you point to in the link is very weak. As I mentioned, the 7 thunders statement does not pin-point anyone in particular. The Mystery of God… book statement about Adam and Eve = Spirit and the bride is also satisfied when you consider that Eve = Bride = church which is what Ahn wrote elsewhere. Since there is no evidence of Ahn ever having written a book claiming there is heavenly mother, there is nothing to show that Umm read his book surreptitiously. That claim cannot be proved. It is also not proper to say that Umm could only have got the idea from Ahn’s book when it existence is doubtful. Umm could have thought of it herself or got the idea from the Moonies who already had this concept before.
    Regarding people not wanting to see the evidence, it can work both ways.

    • The True WMSCOG

      1. The preface of the book states that it is to stop people from behaving fanatically due to their interpretations, and Christ Ahnsahnghong specifically named Um Soo In.
      2. Yes at that time when the Um Soo In incident happened some of the female church members actually followed Um Soo In, those are the ones Christ Ahnsahnghong is talking about. Those women were expelled from the Church alongside Um Soo In.
      3. And did the Old testament testify to Jesus by name??? and Just as the word “lamb” can represent the people of God, as well as Christ (the Savior). The word “bride” can be used to represent the Church (the people of God) as well as Mother (the savior).
      4. Again in the bible, one biblical character can be used to represent more than one person. for example, Isaac is used to represent Christ (Galatians 3:16), but in the same book of Galatians Isaac is used to represent the people of God (Galatians 4:28)
      5. No, there is more evidence in addition to the wedding photograph… Christ Ahnsahnghong held the General Assembly in the place where Mother was.
      6. It was a notebook with sermon notes. Many of those notebooks are in the WMSCOG, and I have seen them with my own eyes. One of His sermons is entitled: “Walking with God” — In this sermon Christ Ahnsahnghong started the sermon with the verse, “I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you” (John 13:13-15), and afterwards He wrote as follows: “Elisha followed Elijah. Joshua followed Moses. Peter followed Jesus. I follow Mother.” You very well know that it did not all come up after His death, in question 5 you acknowledge the photograph Christ Ahnsahnghong took with Mother, that picture was taken while Christ Ahnsahnghong was alive, and as the saying goes… a picture is worth a thousand words.
      7. If that book as the only book Christ Ahnsahnghong wrote, and no other… you have a point. But since there are other testimonies where Christ Ahnsahnghong testified that there is God the Mother, and He testified to Her being Zahng Gil Jah, one can understand that the book was strictly about Um Soo In and her followers… for that reason Christ Ahnsahnghong mentioned her by name.
      8. You do acknowledge someone is coming after Christ Ahnsahnghong although it does not pinpoint her, however with the photograph He took before leaving this world He pinpointed to Zahng Gil Jah. In the Mystery of God statement, Christ Ahnsahnghong is not talking about the Bride as the Church, for he says that the Bride will appear to lead the Church members. The reason we are confident is the explanation, is because this explanation came from people who were alive and there at the time, I have seen the evidence with my own eyes and can testify to it clearly… You can take it or leave it.. its up to you…

  6. Diane

    Your points 1 2 and 3. The fact is he actually wrote disputing every one of the ideas of Umm Soo In and not just her specifically. He specifically disputed about the bride and about eve. If it was about Umm alone, he would logically have just disputed her claim about herself but not shot down the doctrine itself.
    Jesus’ name is actually Yeshua which means the salvation of the Lord which is very much from the bible. The Lord promised to send Yeshua because he promised to send His salvation. Then again you cannot compare those prophecies with Ahn and Zahng. Zahng lived in the time of Ahn so it is pretty obvious that he should have named her at least in the last book before his death.
    If he could spend time and effort on writing a book to shoot down Umm it is strange that he would not put down Zahng in writing.
    4. Yes true. But he wrote that in direct rebuttal to the claim of Umm. In that context he explained what Eve represented.
    5. That is very weak evidence.
    6. Again he thought it necessary to publish a book and also have a second edition released when it came to Umm but for Zahng it is only personal notes? In Korean? Do you read Korean or did someone explain it to you? Can you explain what he meant by “I follow Mother”?
    I am aware that there is a photograph of Ahn and Zahng. It does not follow that Ahn had such a photograph taken. These days a photograph can be made to lie just as much as a thousand words. I wouldn’t depend on just that one piece of evidence.
    7. You claim there are other testimonies in his books but you have only provided a single one where he says “I follow Mother” for which I request an explanation.
    8. Can you quote exactly what he said in that Mystery of God statement? Is it the same thing you said in 6 above?

    • The True WMSCOG

      I feel like I am going in circles with you, I explain the same things again and again. You would be right in believing the book is not just about Um Soo In, but in the idea of God the Mother if Christ Ahnsahnghong had not testified to the existence of Heavenly Mother in other writings. So the fact that He testified to the existence of Mother in other writings lets us understand the reason for Christ Ahnsahnghong mentioning Um Soo In by name in the preface of the book as a book directed to her.

      The name Jesus or Yeshua does not appear in the Old Testament, you could argue that the meaning of the name appears… but not the name itself.

      My point in making the reference to Jesus’ name not being in the Old Testament, is to show that you do not necesarily need to see the name of a person writen in a statement to know that the statement is talking about them. For example every Christian knows that Isaiah 53 is talking about Jesus, even though His name doesnt appear there. It is in the same way with Zahng Gil Jah being God the Mother. Even though Her name doesn’t appear in the testimonies about God the Mother, but Christ Ahnsahnghong left a picture that He took with Her, this picture was left in order to testify to the Bride of the Holy Spirit.

      4. Yes but in other books, Christ Ahnsahnghong said that the Eve is the Bride of the Holy Spirit who will lead the people of God.

      “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life” Chapter 24

      “…In Revelation 22:17, the last Adam and Eve are called the Spirit and the Bride…The above prophecy shows that Jesus–the second Adam who came 1900 years ago will come again in the flesh again in the last days and lead all the animals [Gentiles]. The Bible calls the Gentiles, who are to be saved, “all kind of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air…”

      Christ Ahnsahnghong testified that the Holy Spirit and the Bride, who are the reality of Adam and Eve, will appear in the last days and lead all the people to salvation. Here, the people are represented as the animals; therefore, the bride cannot be the people of God. Like this Christ Ahnsahnghong testified about Heavenly Mother, the Savior who would lead Gods people after Him.

      5. Is not weak, because all the years before that Christ Ahnsahnghong held the General Assembly in the place where He resided, however His last General Assembly He held it in the place where Mother resided, He also said that from that point on the General Assembly would be held in the place where Mother is. That’s a big deal, if you know and understand the Church of God.

      Also regarding the photograph, Christ Ahnsahnghong knew there would be people like yourself saying that the picture was edited or altered… that is why Christ Ahnsahnghong also left the film of the photograph… isn’t that amazing? that’s why I have no doubt.

      6. Yes I can understand a little Korean, and I also had people explain it to me. And what is it that you do not understand about Christ Ahnsahnghong saying “I follow Mother”?

      7. I have been mentioning the other books throughout my articles and replies to your posts… I am sure you have read them by now.

      8. read #4

      • Diane

        You said: “I feel like I am going in circles with you, I explain the same things again and again. You would be right in believing the book is not just about Um Soo In, but in the idea of God the Mother if Christ Ahnsahnghong had not testified to the existence of Heavenly Mother in other writings. So the fact that He testified to the existence of Mother in other writings lets us understand the reason for Christ Ahnsahnghong mentioning Um Soo In by name in the preface of the book as a book directed to her.”
        I too feel I am going in circles with you. You keep saying he testified to Zahng in other writings but you offer no example except the “I follow mother” one which is unclear.
        The photograph without an explanatory note of some sort is meaningless don’t you think? It is hardly clinching evidence. There must be hundreds of his photographs with others as well but you choose just this one.
        Point 4. There is nothing in what you have quoted of Ahn’s writing to say that Eve/Bride will lead the people. One part mentions Adam and Eve are called the spirit and bride but he continues to say that Jesus the second Adam will lead…
        Where does he say that Eve refers to Zahng/Mother or anything? In fact when Umm made the same claim, he said that Eve is not a woman at all. You will again say I am going in circles but you fail to prove your point.
        5. The place where Zahng resided was better logistically. I am not saying the picture is edited.
        6. It is a simple question. Who is “I” and who is “Mother” and how exactly does “I” follow “Mother”? If Ahn is referring to his biological mother it makes sense because he followed her into the SDA church. Is that what you mean?
        7. You have not provided a single quote from any of his books to support your claim other than “I follow Mother” which itself is still not explained.
        8. My comments against point 4 above too.

        • The True WMSCOG

          “I follow Mother” means that Christ Ahnsahnghong approves of Mothers decisions, so if we believe in Christ Ahnsahnghong, then we have to follow his example, and that is to follow Heavenly Mother.

          Well in the picture there was a banner that said: “This photograph is to testify to the Bride of the Holy Spirit”… Christ Ahnsahnghong knew people would have questions like yours…

          4. The point of quoting that part of Christ Ahnsahnghongs book, is to show that Christ Ahnsahnghong also testified that Eve did not represent the people of God, He also testified that Eve represent someone else other than the people of God, and that someone else is the Bride of the Holy Spirit. For if the last Adam is a life giving spirit, then the bride of the life giving spirit must be the last Eve.

          5. Well, Christ Ahnsahnghong did not say the place was ideal, He said that the General Assembly will be where ever Mother is, this means that where ever Mother goes, in that place the General Assembly will be held. So if you are not saying that the picture is edited, then these words you said: “… It does not follow that Ahn had such a photograph taken. These days a photograph can be made to lie just as much as a thousand words. I wouldn’t depend on just that one piece of evidence…” what do they mean??? How can Christ Ahnsahnghong not have such photograph taken, if he was in the picture itself?? and how can a photograph be made to lie, if its not edited? Im not understanding your logic.

          6. Do you have evidence that Christ Ahnsahnghong followed His biological Mother into the SDA Church?? He was a 30 year old man when He joined the SDA Church, not a kid…

          7. It was in a sermon, not everything Christ Ahnsahnghong taught is on His books, there are many things He left written in his sermon notebooks, and also things He taught those who walked with Him directly.

          • Diane

            Perhaps you can show here the exact context of “I follow Mother” by quoting the entire paragraph. Then we can see whether it matches your interpretation.
            About that picture, it seems to be central to your entire faith. Yet it is strange that neither your website nor the official watv website displays the picture. Would you blame people for their scepticism?
            4. Even if you say that he claimed that Eve is the bride, you still haven’t proved your point because he himself said in the same book on Umm that the bride is the church. So it matches that Eve is the people of God and Eve is the bride who is also the people of God.
            5. I had made that statement because somewhere I read you had written that a picture speaks a thousand words. I am sorry if it hurt you. I am not saying that the picture is edited. I am saying a picture can be edited. I do not know if this one has been. I have never seen the picture.
            6. I have read that his mother became a member before him. His age is irrelevant.
            7 I find it odd that he wrote so many books including one about Umm which he republished. yet he didn’t write in any book about Zahng Gil Jah.

            Once again I request you to check for abuse and not keep my posts pending for moderation for such a long time.

          • The True WMSCOG

            Diane, if you have a hard time accepting something as elemental as the importance of keeping the Passover of the New Covenant… What relevance does it make if I type the paragraph or show the picture… thats irrelevant information.

            The picture is not central to our entire faith, is just one more evidence… but even if that picture didnt exist, Zahng Gil Jan-nim is still God the Mother, whether you like it or not… You know even though Jesus showed the Pharisees many undeniable proofs of Him being Christ, they still didn’t believe… thats why Jesus said: “…though having eyes, they cannot see…”

            4. I think I already explained this somewhere else and you agreed. “…Again in the bible, one biblical character can be used to represent more than one person. for example, Isaac is used to represent Christ (Galatians 3:16), but in the same book of Galatians Isaac is used to represent the people of God (Galatians 4:28)..” that’s what I said, and you said… “Yes true…”. That means that you agree to the fact that in the Bible one Biblical character can be used to represent Gods people and the same character can be used to represent the savior. In quoting the Mystery of God and Christ Ahnsahnghongs explanation, what I was trying to share is that Christ Ahnsahnghong did not only say that “Eve” represents the Church or Saints, but that “Eve” also represents the Bride who will lead the people of God. How many times do I need to repeat the same thing??

            5. I did not get hurt, I just didn’t understand your logic.

            6. Oh really where did you read that his mother became a member before him? Age is pretty relevant.

            7. He didn’t need to write a book to testify to Zahng Gil Jah being Heavenly Mother… Again, did Jesus write any books testifying to the things you believe to be His words??

            I’m sorry, but I do not sit behind a computer all day waiting for you to comment in order to approve your comments. I do have bills to pay and family to look after. In reality I have the right to not approve your comments if I chose to, It is my website, so I guess we just have to work on our patience don’t we… :0)

          • Hi Diane.

            The most important book of Christ Ahnsahnghong is “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life.” If you read the book carefully, you can understand the book is a book to testifies to God the Mother. Do you know why the title includes “the Spring of the Water of Life”? And do you know what/who is the spring of the water of life?

            Please read the following article:

            http://christahnsahnghong.org/index.php/counter-argument-to-the-false-claim-that-god-the-mother-doesnt-exist-because-christ-ahnsahnghong-never-taught-that-hebrew-word-elohim-referred-to-plural-god/

            Christ Ahnsahnghong clearly testified to God the Mother in His book.

            Especially, to understand Heavenly Jerusalem, we should keep the feasts of God. It’s written in the Bible,

            On that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem, half to the eastern sea and half to the western sea, in summer and in winter. (Zech. 14:8)

            Then the survivors from all the nations that have attacked Jerusalem will go up year after year to worship the King, the LORD Almighty, and to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles. If any of the peoples of the earth do not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD Almighty, they will have no rain. If the Egyptian people do not go up and take part, they will have no rain. The LORD will bring on them the plague he inflicts on the nations that do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles. This will be the punishment of Egypt and the punishment of all the nations that do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles. (Zech. 14:16-19)

            The prophet Zechariah prophesied that those who do not go up to Jerusalem, they will not have rain (that is, they will not receive the Spirit.) And those who do not celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles will receive plague. You might argue that it’s about the feast of the old covenant. But it’s about the new covenant. The old covenant was celebrated by the Israelites only. But the prophet Zechariah wrote, “all nations (not only the Israelites) will go to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles.” Those who keep the Feast of Tabernacles of the new covenant can receive the rain [the Spirit]. So, Jesus showed an example by keeping the Feast of the Tabernacles:

            But when the Jewish Feast of Tabernacles was near… Not until halfway through the Feast did Jesus go up to the temple courts and begin to teach…. On the last and greatest day of the Feast [the Feast of Tabernacles], Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, streams of living water will flow from within him.” (John 7:2-38)

            Jesus also showed that those who keep the Feast of Tabernacles receive the living water or the Spirit.

            If you keep the Feast of Tabernacles, you can receive the water and you can understand the reality of Jerusalem. However, if you do not keep the Feast of Tabernacles, you cannot receive the water and you cannot be saved. Christ Ahnsahnghong said that those who keep each feast come to know the profound meaning of the feast (Chapter 2 of “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life.”)

            The Feast of Tabernacles is drawing near. How about abandoning your thoughts and keeping the Feast of Tabernacles by following the Bible? Please remember the word of prophet Zechariah “The LORD will bring on them the plague he inflicts on the nations that do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles.”

          • Diane

            Hello skyblueguy. You said
            ———————————————————————————————————————-
            The most important book of Christ Ahnsahnghong is “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life.” If you read the book carefully, you can understand the book is a book to testifies to God the Mother. Do you know why the title includes “the Spring of the Water of Life”? And do you know what/who is the spring of the water of life?
            ———————————————————————————————————————
            So let us see what answer we get from the bible. Shall we look at Jn 7:37-39?

            **************************************************************************************
            37 On the last and greatest day of the festival, Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “Let anyone who is thirsty come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as Scripture has said, rivers of living water will flow from within them.” 39 By this he meant the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were later to receive. Up to that time the Spirit had not been given, since Jesus had not yet been glorified.
            **************************************************************************************
            So it looks like the bible says it is the Spirit which is the living water and the believers received this Spirit on the day of Pentecost.

          • Diane

            Hello TTW. You said:
            ———————————————————————————————————–
            Diane, if you have a hard time accepting something as elemental as the importance of keeping the Passover of the New Covenant… What relevance does it make if I type the paragraph or show the picture… thats irrelevant information.
            ———————————————————————————————————–
            I believe in the body and blood of Jesus but I do not accept that this is the new covenant passover. A passover had two elements; the slaying of the lamb and the subsequent meal. Since Jesus is our passover lamb, the NC passover must observe this as the fulfilment of the sacrifice and consequently the meal that happened before this sacrifice cannot be called the NC passover.

            You said:
            ——————————————————————————————————————–
            The picture is not central to our entire faith, is just one more evidence… but even if that picture didnt exist, Zahng Gil Jan-nim is still God the Mother, whether you like it or not… You know even though Jesus showed the Pharisees many undeniable proofs of Him being Christ, they still didn’t believe… thats why Jesus said: “…though having eyes, they cannot see…”
            ——————————————————————————————————————–
            The proofs Jesus gave the Pharisees were incontrovertible. Yours are certainly not.

            4. I agree about one character can represent multiple. But you are trying to avoid my point. Even if Eve is the Bride, she is not a woman according to Ahnsahnghong. He has also said that the Bride is the church. Don’t use circular logic.

            6. I think I got it from NCPCOG. How is age relevant? As far as I can see, it would only be relevant if his mother forced him to convert.

            7. You cannot compare Jesus with Ahnsahnghong because Jesus never wrote even a single book. Ahnsahnghong wrote many books. That is why if Mother was what he wanted to teach about, it was such a radical thing, it would have been written in some book by him.

            I do understand that “do not sit behind a computer all day waiting for you to comment in order to approve your comments.” I do not mean to upset you and your plans. All I am saying is there had been times when my comments were lying unapproved for over 10 days while other comments were getting approved immediately. I keep my posts clean and without abuse.

          • The True WMSCOG

            How can Jesus establish the New Covenant after He dies??? the argument you are making, is the same one the Hebrew writer explained.

            Hebrews 9:16-17 — In the case of a will(covenant), it is necessary to prove the death of the one who made it, because a will is in force only when somebody has died; it never takes effect while the one made it is living.

            Therefore the will has to be established before He was crucified, but it takes effect after He is crucified. Jesus kept the Passover on the 14th of Abib according to the Bible (Lev 23:4-5), however he was Crucified on the 15th of Abib in order to fulfill the prophecy of the feast of Unleavened bread as well. The Feast of Unleavened Bread was knows as the feast of affliction, for this reason His suffering was in order to fulfill the affliction.
            No other night, but the Passover night did Jesus promise His body and blood. To say I believe in the Body and the Blood of Jesus but I do not call it Passover, nor do I believe it should be celebrated on the day of the Passover, its like saying I believe the United States is an independent country, but I do not call the day of its commemoration “Independence Day” nor do I celebrate it July 4th… That just doesn’t make sense, I don’t think any person from the USA would do that.
            _____________________________________________

            Incontrovertible: Impossible to deny or disprove

            What Jesus showed the Pharisees was not Incontrovertible, because obviously they denied them. Other people were claiming to be the Christ, and doing miracles during the time of Jesus (Acts 5:36-37). That’s why Jesus said the following:

            Luke 16:31 — He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’

            In the same way, even if I were to show you evidence where Christ Ahnsahnghong said: God the Mother is Zahng Gil Jahnim, you wouldn’t believe, simply because something as elemental as the importance of the Passover and the Sabbath you don’t believe. That’s why I don’t want to waste my time and yours continuing with this.. Like I said, I feel like I am talking to a wall.

            _________________________________________________________

            4. And Christ Ahnsahnghong also said that the Bride is Zahng Gil Jahnim… However you do not believe in Christ Ahnsahnghong, so why does it matter to you what Christ Ahnsahnghong said or not? This would only matter if you were a member of the NCPCOG.

            6. Are you a member of the NCPCOG? If you are not, I think discussing these topics with you will lead to nothing. So at the age of 30 His Mother forced Him to convert, where did you get that, NCPCOG too??

            7. It is written in the books by Him, but like I keep saying… You do not believe it, so whats the point of discussing about it. You don’t believe the idea that there is God the Mother, you deny Genesis 1:26-27 and Revelation 22:17 which testify to it; so how can you believe that Zahng Gil Jahnim is God the Mother Herself. It would be like trying to believe in Jesus, when you do not even believe that there is a Messiah who was to come…

            Well, if you direct your comments directly to me I think is just fair that I have time to sit down, read them and reply to them.

  7. hassler

    The book is not against God the mother,our Jerusalem mother but for Um soo-in who wanted be a God the mother
    She pretended to be the wife of our father, Ahnsahnghongnim in front of the members of the WMSCOG
    That’s why father said there is no mother at the moment to Um soo-in
    The Bible and our father, Ahnsahnghongnim testified to the existence of heavenly mother

    • Diane

      Since Ahnsahnghong was held in high esteem in his church, he could have told the truth and said there is a heavenly mother but Umm is not her.
      Why did he have to lie and say there is no heavenly mother?

      • The True WMSCOG

        Christ Ahnsahnghong did not lie. The reason He wrote the way He did is because He did not want anyone else to say “I am the Bride of the Holy Spirit” until the time for Him to reveal her came.

        Isaiah 43:10-11 — “You are my witnesses,” declares the LORD, “and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. I, even I, am the LORD, and apart from me there is no savior.

        You said that you believe in Jesus, and that Jesus is your Savior. But Jehovah God said that after Him there will be no God, and that there is no Savior but Him… Would you say Jehovah God is lying? Why didn’t Jehovah God say: “I am the Savior now, but later one another one will come…”

  8. Sally Som

    Praise be to Our God! Thanks to them we have the Truth and Our Heavenly Father Christ Ahnsahnghong made known to us his children the True and only Mother our Holy Heavenly Mother New Jerusalem who is the Bride that gives Salvation in the last days!

  9. Kim

    I myself saw the photograph of Christ Ahnsahnghong with Mother dressed in wedding clothes–this was not a picture that He took with “others”. I was so touched that They went through so much to show me who They are.

    I am thankful that God gave me eyes to see and ears to hear Them.

  10. Francois

    2,000 years ago, Apostle Paul testified we have a Mother in the kingdom of Heaven (Gal 4:26). Then, can we say that Apostle Paul was delusional? Of course not. Then the idea of God the Mother is not delusional. In the case of Um Soo In (the fake bride), we must understand something: A fake Gucci bag cannot exist without the existence of the real Gucci bag. In the same way, if the real Bride, God the Mother did not exist, where did Um Soo In (the fake bride) get the idea to make the false claim that she was the bride? You ask to ask yourself these types of questions to determine the facts of the matter. The reason why Um Soo In claimed she was the bride is because she saw one of Christ Ahnsahnghong’s books testifying about Mother, the true Bride, appearing in the future. Again, in order for the fake one to exist, the real one has to exist but thanks to God Elohim, the real One is the Bride, our Heavenly Father’s wife (the Holy City, the New Jerusalem (Rev. 21: 9-10)).

    Our faith should never be based on people’s actions, views, opinions and thoughts. Instead, we should use the manual for salvation that God gives us, the Bible. Truly, the female image of God exists (Gen. 1:26-27) who is testified as God the Mother. All the prophecies in the Bible confirm God the Mother exists. The Spirit and the Bride are calling all mankind to come and receive eternal life. No mere man and woman can give us eternal life? Only God can give us eternal life. In the age of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit and the Bride are the ones who are earnestly calling us and saying “Come” to receive the free gift of the water of life (eternal life) (Rev. 22:17). Truly thanks to our Father Christ Ahnsahnghong for giving us all the truth and for revealing to us the true Bride, our Heavenly Mother.

  11. Antonia

    Christ Anhsahnghong told us who the heavenly mother is. Just because people try to nit-pick and try to get others not to believe, doesn’t change the fact that she exists.

  12. Khyan

    I agree with Antonia. The bible states in Galatians 6 that people go out of there way to trap the people of God by insisting the old covenant of circumcision for fear of persecution for the name of Christ. Could that be why you don’t acknowledge Christ Ahnsahnghong and then refute God the Mother? You fear being persecuted because you don’t except that he is God? The fact that you can’t acknowledge him means that you know longer want understanding how she is God, and so receive salvation, but just to commit to an argument to draw us and others to dispute the way of truth. If you saw countless writings about God the Mother being specifically “our Mother” would you then come back and keep the teachings of the church and refute your 10,000 false rebuttals? From your consistent negating statements I don’t think that is the case. Therefore isn’t it safe to say that “The True WMSCOG’s” previous statements about you are making this argument a waste of time.

  13. Kimberly

    I Thank Christ Ahnsahnhong for writing this book. He is true God testified in the bible he knows what is best for us. If you first realize Christ Ahnsahnghong is God then you will not question anything he does, he is God he is perfect. If he felt that at that time the best way for us to see truth from false was to write a book then that was the best way! Um Soo defiantly can not be God the Mother because she distorted the teachings of the bible which God uses to show us the right way to receive salvation. God the Mother the New Jerusalem does exist and according to the teachings of the bible only Christ Ahnsahnghong will reveal her!

  14. Carlos G.

    This is really an Amazing Article!!! It shows how much love heavenly Parents have for the children.
    Please understand Father’s will in doing this.
    For example: When Jesus was being Cruficy and the rebel told him “Please, Remember me when you come into your Kingdom” and Jesus replied “Today you will be with me in paradise.” Does that mean that anyone who ask Jesus, “Please, Remember me when you come into your Kingdom” will enter Kingdom of Hevan? No. That was an especial Law that Christ made to save the rebel because of his situation. Same thing now, Christ Ahnsahnghong made that book with a special law to protect his chosen one from being deceive and misled. Please understand with a Son’s mind. GBYSM!!

Submit a Comment

%d bloggers like this: